Weblog

Friday, 27 June 2008

Friday, 30 November 2007

  • I honestly regret giving my xanga the name: alsdkajdh. I still can't recall it when I want to log in and post. I need to resort to my email subscription digest for reference. It's time to change the name of my xanga, but that means I need to get rid of this xanga, and that means I need to beg everyone to resubscribe to me....

    Would that be ok?  (depressed sigh)

Saturday, 24 November 2007

  • fisticuffs on amazon.com

    Someone gave a poor rating to an excellent book. It is not only an excellent book that this insipid man gave a poor rating to, but it is an excellent book by Dostoevsky. Moreover, the reviewer persisted in using words like 'penultimate', a special academic word that's probably on the English Lit GRE.

    Here is the BAD review of Demons by Dostoevsky:

    This book is simply horrible. No one should read it. I've now read more or less all of this author's works and all I can say is that he didn't have a very good command of basic narrative mechanics. For all his celebrated genius, and it is considerable, the man just couldn't tell a good story to save his life.

    So weak are his transitions, that, for example, his narrator constantly has to break in and say: "no one could have expected the following denoument," or "but I need to elaborate on this minor character." That really gets tiresome after a while. His confused plot stucture has the very annoying effect of introducing major changes in the characters at exactly the moment that you have forgotten all about them, viz, the penultimate chapter that concerns the important revelation of a figure who hasn't been mentioned for about 200 pages.

    The book itself--structured so to speak around a political murder--moves like a snail hitched to a team of other, slower snails. The murder doesn't happen until after about 500 painful pages. The entire first part, some 200 pages, can be entirely skipped without any serious loss of comprehension.

    Reactionaries like this book because it pokes fun at forerunners of the Russian revolution. I'm sure that there were lots of whackos involved in the whole affair and its aftermath. But all I can see that the author does is ridicule the nihilists. Yet some very well respected philosophers were nihilists, and, golly, the revolution must have been about something more than just murder and mayhem. (Wasn't Tzarist oppression at least a little part of it?)

    Unlike the author's other (badly written) books like the Idiot and Crime and Punishment, this one even lacks the sort of transcendent moments of philosophical dialogue. These epiphanies (unlike Joyce's) take place in dialoges and are like the revelations one gets during a seizure (Dostovesky was an epileptic)--the conversations that Raskolnikov has with Sophia and the Prince Myshkin are examples. Personally, I ultimately didn't find those infrequent passages profound enough to make it worth trodging through C & P and the Idiot, but it was a close call. However Demons doesn't even give you those wonderful experiences--just a straight ahead unpolished rant.

    The best thing about this book is the wonderful cover that graces the Vintage edition. It's a woodcut from Lynd Ward's God's Man. It's appropriate because one of the many themes that gets garbled amid the novel's 714 pages is the struggle between humans and demonic ideas. If you want to read an interesting take on a man being haunted by demons, read God's Man by all means, and not this jumbled "classic."


    There is a logical fallacy at the exposition of his tasteless review: nothing by Dostoevsky is simply horrible. Some of it is horrible, but in a delicious way that appeals to the neurotic axe murdering side of one's funny bone.

    This response is smile inducing. Nothing better than an overly formal attack to spite huffity puffity stupidity.

    This review says much about the reviewer and little about Dostoyevsky. Those who understand the Russian genius might even laugh at this reviewer, whose tirade against a novel loved by "reactionaries" is reminiscent of Kirillov's rants.

    The book is ferociously funny from the start, and its ironies, political barbs and hilarious insights kept me riveted throughout. Those who are sophisticated enough to see the life force and humor in this masterpiece will not be disappointed, and certainly will not lament the adroit build-up to the murder. Additionally, the reviewer displays remarkable naivite by the redundant statement: "The entire first part ... can be entirely skipped without any serious loss of comprehension."

    This edition is an excellent translation into readable English.

Friday, 23 November 2007

  • Karaoke and... Ohh what is this!?

    I spent much of my thanksgiving singing dreadfully to songs I barely know, while Masakun destroyed all competition by using his impressively versatile voice in both Japanese and English. Yes, it was a night of Karaoke at my Aunt's house, preceded by sushi, turkey, and mashed potatoes... and coffee!

    Fast forward...  I'm home again, browsing craigslist out of the perverse curiosity that randomly coaxes me to browse sex ads... And what do I find?! Oh! Yoandi, my fellow co-worker from two years ago (and your pathetic boyfriend), you two must be rather bored to post something so crude!





    A question suddenly enters one's mind: is it creepier to post such hopes for misadventure on craigslist, or is it creepier to report that people you sorta-kinda knew once are posting such hopes for misadventure on craigslist? I messed around with him  (the guy with jeans) once... in a bathroom stall, but I didn't finish because it felt so dirty! That, and Yoandi can't kiss at all. He's too brutish and stupid to kiss well. A final note of destructive negativity: his boyfriend is obese, so, therefore, he should probably post a more... accurate, picture of himself. Dammit; I realize this whole post is utterly mean, but are these not the first thoughts that enter your mind when A) you discover an unimpressive person you once knew and didn't ever like is resorting to scandelous online behavior and B) the picture of his boyfriend is something of a tremendous earth shattering lie?!  Well, you'd have to be ghandi to safeguard yourself from such immediate reactions! Raw thoughts of a despoiled mind are thusly laid out, like sewage, to devour. Rah hahahaha

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]

alsdkajdh

  • Visit alsdkajdh's Xanga Site
    • Name: Ryan
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 2/3/2007

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • Chances are you'll hate my xanga. That's because it boggles your mind.

Blogrings

[no blogrings]

Pulse

alsdkajdh has no pulse!...

Recommended

[no recommendations]